This app works decently...but
why does every weather app
(software) writer think that the background needs to these ugly photos, or gifs.
Personally, I would prefer a simple whitish background that is easier on the eyes than watches stuff whip across a little screen every time that I want to check the dang weather conditions.
IMHO, Weather Underground was on the right track with their backgrounds since they use a very sink color scheme and push information as the important factor and not some random useless photograph of a place or sky that I personally do not care about. I am concerned about my weather conditions, not the sky over Kansas or New York, it just doesnt interest me while I am checking to see if my home is going to be swept away by flood waters or blown away by a storm, etc.
In summary, please save the cutesy photo based backgrounds for your stupid Facebook page, when I am checking the weather it is much more important that the information be correct than cute.
This is particularly important when I have PAID for the app, this is when I should definitely have the right to decide that the backgrounds can go. So when the clouds are rolling out, and you are still showing a cloudy picture..... something is not adding up for a paid subscriber when it is cloudy or partly sunny outside but you are still forcing photos of cloudy backgrounds.
FYI: if you utilized a generic background, then when the weather changes the user of the app truly gets to experience the weather in a visually cleaner environment since it will not be pre-determined as to what the user gets to see.
Garfield_Collector about
Weather Live°, v4.9